For Presidential and Congressional candidates who refuse to provide voters with their positions, Vote Smart has researched their public records to determine their likely responses. These issue positions are from 2022.
Yes | In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending? | ||
Yes | In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket? | ||
Absolutely, I support progressive taxation. Specifically, I support the FAST Fair Automatic Simple Tax, which is best described as a hybrid of progressive and flat taxation. Corporations and wealthy Americans will pay a little more, and those living in poverty will be the only ones elibible for federal tax exemption. |
Yes | Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions? | ||
The only way to achieve free, fair, and open elections is through a publicly funded General Election system, and for elections to be driven by Debate. Internal party polling should be conducted exclusively by the parties; the public should not finance primary elections. Since the most important aspect of an election is public/voter education of the various choices of candidates and platforms, existing election authorities should publicize (required) candidate websites. Candidates should be required to disclose planned agendas, and be required to debate their opponents, if challenged. Debating public policy is what any elected official does, after all. |
No | Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes? | ||
Yes | Do you support alternatives to incarceration for certain non-violent offenders such as mandatory counseling or substance abuse treatment? | ||
No | Do you support mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenders? | ||
Substance abuse is a healthcare issue, and should be treated as such. The best practice model should be Portugal, which by decriminalizing even the hardest drugs in 2001, and simultaneously expanding access to substance abuse treatment, has proven to be the most sane model. Of course marijuana, with it's medicinal potential and nonexistent addictive profile has been successfully legalized in many states and nations around the world, and even serves as a contributor to the tax base where it has been regulated. |
Yes | Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
Yes | Do you support lowering taxes as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
Yes | Do you support providing tax incentives to businesses for the purpose of job creation? | ||
I support federal, state, and local spending on targeted projects that serve the public good in such areas as infrastructure and public health, (affordable) housing, education, transportation and general commerce activity. With regard to enterprise, there is certainly a proven case that programs to incubate new businesses temporarily through tax incentives can be the drivers of some remarkable successes. I don't see a need to subsidize already successful and wealthy enterprises in the absence of any pressing public interest that might be served. |
Unknown Position | Do you generally support requiring states to adopt federal education standards? | ||
|
|||
Yes, and educational administrators in the states should have a voice in deciding what education reforms are viable and useful. |
No | Do you support building the Keystone XL pipeline? | ||
Yes | Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)? | ||
Yes | Do you support increased regulations on the hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") industry? | ||
Fossil fuel consumption is a threat to survival of life on the planet. Renewable (and freely available) energy should be the standard, not the "alternative." Chemical fracking, as it is better described, presents immediate and proximate dangers wherever it is practiced, and should be halted completely. |
Yes | Do you believe that human activity is contributing to climate change? | ||
Yes | Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions? | ||
Local, state, national, and international authorities should be engaged in regulating and measuring the success of all environmental efforts. |
Yes | Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")? | ||
I support replacing the ACA with a single payer, general revenue funded Medicare for All model that would finally guarantee universal access to healthcare. In this age of emerging infectious diseases, and even the return of some thought to be long eradicated, it is at our own peril that we allow anybody within our borders to be excluded from access to healthcare services. |
Unknown Position | Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship? | ||
|
|||
As a candidate who qualified by the petition method, I have come to appreciate the value of having this public test of viability in the election process, although thresholds are set too high in many states. I propose that as a primary process in the immigration process for prospective immigrants in their own countries, and in lieu of deportation for undocumented immigrants already in country, that a requirement of a substantial number of character vouchers be used in the determination of immigration eligibility, with more weight given to this type of qualifying exercise than has been previously relied on. |
Yes | Do you support same-sex marriage? | ||
As far as I know I am the only LGBT candidate in my contest, and I support full equality for all Americans, including constitutional amendment to guarantee those rights, not only for the question of marriage, but also in employment, healthcare, housing, education, and marketplace access situations. |
Yes | Do you support allowing individuals to divert a portion of their Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts? | ||
I could support a small allowance (probably less than 5% for diversion, especially for funds or bonds invested in the infrastructure, energy, science and medicine, and affordable housing markets. |
SpendingIndicate what federal spending levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.TaxesIndicate what federal tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.
Slightly Increase | a) Agriculture | ||
Slightly Increase | b) Arts | ||
Slightly Decrease | c) Defense | ||
Slightly Increase | d) Education | ||
Greatly Increase | e) Environment | ||
Greatly Increase | f) Homeland Security | ||
Slightly Increase | g) International aid | ||
Greatly Increase | h) Medical Research | ||
Greatly Increase | i) Scientific Research | ||
Slightly Increase | j) Space exploration | ||
Slightly Increase | k) United Nations | ||
Slightly Increase | l) Welfare | ||
m) Other or expanded categories | |||
Slightly Increase | a) Capital gains taxes | ||
Slightly Increase | b) Corporate taxes | ||
Maintain Status | c) Small business taxes | ||
Slightly Increase | d) Excise taxes (alcohol) | ||
Slightly Increase | e) Excise taxes (cigarettes) | ||
Slightly Increase | f) Excise taxes (transportation fuel) | ||
Maintain Status | g) Income taxes (low-income families) | ||
Slightly Decrease | h) Income taxes (middle-income families) | ||
Greatly Increase | i) Income taxes (high-income families) | ||
Slightly Decrease | j) Inheritance taxes | ||
Slightly Decrease | k) Payroll taxes | ||
l) Other or expanded categories |
Because of it's life and death implications, I have stated that my top legislative priority is Police Reform, as well as custodial (Prison, Sentencing, and Juvenile Justice reform). My next priority is for broad social security issues, like protection from predatory financial schemes, protection of the primary home, universal access to healthcare and education, and support of an adequate minimum wage. |
Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.